[1] I. Ahmad and F. Koki. Calculation of reactions cross section for neutron-induced reactions on 127I isotope. International Journal of Medical Physics, Clinical Engineering and Radiation Oncology, 6(1): 344–359, 2018, doi:10.4236/ijmpcero.2017.63031.
[2] I. Ahmad, Y. Y. Ibrahim, and K. F.S. Evaluations of reactions cross section of radionuclide by particles induced nuclear reactions using exifon code. Boson Journal of Modern Physics, 3(2): 220–235, 2018.
[3] K. Ayhan. Excitation function calculations of neutron-induced reactions of some zirconium target isotopes. Journal of Fusion Energy, 36: 230–233, 2018, doi:10.1007/s10894-017-0143-0.
[4] H. Naik, G.N. Kim, K. Kim, M. Zaman, M. Nadeem,and M. Sahid. Neutron-induced reaction cross-section of 93Nb with fast neutron based on 9Be(p,n) reaction. Nuclear Physics A, 970(1):156–168, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2017.11.011.
[5] H. Liang, Z. Wu, Z. Zhang, Y. Han, and X. Jiao. Calculations and analysis of n+93Nb reaction. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 187(1): 107–26, 2018, doi:10.1080/00295639.2017.1295699.
[6] A. Koning, D. Rochman, J.C. Sublet, N. Dzysiuk, M. Fleming, and S. Van Der Marck. Tendl: Complete nuclear data library for innovative nuclear science and technology. Nuclear Data Sheets, 155(1): 1–55, 2019, doi:10.1016/j.nds.2019.01.002.
[7] M. Avrigeanu and V. Avrigeanu. Optical potential for incident and emitted low-energy α particles. III. non-statistical processes induced by neutrons on Zr, Nb, and Mo nuclei. Physical Review C, 2022, doi:10.48550/arXiv.2302.09845.
[8] V. Avrigeanu and M. Avrigeanu. Role of consistent parameter sets in an assessment of the α-particle optical potential below the coulomb barrier. Physical Review C, 99(1): 044613, 2019, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.99.044613.
[9] V. Avrigeanu and M. Avrigeanu. Validation of an optical potential for incident and emitted low-energy α-particles in the a ≈ 60 mass range. The European Physical Journal A, 57(1): 54, 2021, doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-020-00336-0.
[10] V. Avrigeanu and M. Avrigeanu. Validation of an optical potential for incident and emitted low-energy α-particles in the a ≈ 60 mass range. II. neutron–induced reactions on Ni isotopes. The European Physical Journal A, 58(1): 189, 2022, doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-022-00831-6.
[11] V. Avrigeanu and M. Avrigeanu. Consistent optical potential for incident and emitted low-energy α particles. II. α emission in fast-neutron-induced reactions on Zr isotopes. Physical Review C, 96(1): 044610, 2018, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044610.
[12] T. Kawano, Y. Cho, P. Dimitriou, D. Filipescu, N. Iwamoto, V. Plujko, and et al. Nuclear data sheets. 163(1): 109–62, 2020, doi:10.1016/j.nds.2019.12.002.
[13] S. Goriely, P. Dimitriou, M. Wiedeking, T. Belgya, R. Firestone, J. Kopecky, and et al. Reference database for photon strength functions. The European Physical Journal A, 55(1): 172, 2019, doi:10.1140/epja/i2019-12840-1.
[14] V. Avrigeanu and M. Avrigeanu. Consistent assessment of neutron-induced activation of 93Nb. Frontiers in Physics, 11(1): 1142436, 2023, doi:10.3389/fphy.2023.1142436.
[15] H. Naik, G. Kim, and K. Kim et al. Measurement of cross sections of zr-isotopes with the fast neutrons based on the 99Be (p,n) reaction. The European Physical Journal A,57(1): 267, 2021, doi:10.1140/epja/s10050-021-00568-8.
[16] H. Naik, G. Kim, and K. Kim et al. Production cross-sections of mo-isotopes induced by fast neutrons based on the 9Be (p, n) reaction. The European Physical Journal Plus, 135(1): 704, 2020, doi:10.1140/epjp/s13360-020-00728-7.
[17] A. Gopalakrishna, G.N. Kim, H. Naik, and et al. Measurement of 99mo production cross-section from the 100Mo(n,2n) reaction with quasi monoenergetic neutron based on the 9Be(p,n) reaction. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry, 316(1): 561–569, 2018, doi:10.1007/s10967-018-5832-2.
[18] Z. Yaling, L. Jianyang, Z. Xunchao, C. Hanjie, Y. Xuesong, Y. Lin, F. Fen, and Y. Lei. Neutronics performance and activation calculation of dense tungstengranular target for China-ADS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, 410(1): 88–101, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.nimb.2017.08.003.
[19] Qiang Wang, Tong Liu, Yijia Qiu, Changlin Lan, Bingjun Chen, Qian Zhang, Xuwen Zhan, and Kaihong Fang. Measurement of the cross sections for 238U (n, ) 239U reaction in the energy range of 14.1-14.8 MeV using neutron activation method. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 152: 125–128, 2018, doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2018.08.013.
[20] M. Kerveno, M. Dupuis, A. Bacquias, F. Belloni, and D. Bernard et al. Measurement of 238U (n, n’γ) cross section data and their impact on reaction models. Physical Review C, 104(4): 0446–0449, 2021, doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.00.004600.
[21] Eric V. Johnstone, Natalia Mayordomo, and Edward J. Mausolf. Discovery, nuclear properties, synthesis and application of echnetium-101. Communications Chemistry, 1(1): 1–9, 2022, doi:10.1038/s42004-022-00746-9.
[22] International Atomic Energy Agency. Impact of fuel density on performance and economy of research reactors. IAEA Nuclear Energy Series, NF-T-2.7, 2021.
[23] Waldemar Witt. Changing the shape of a zirconium nucleus. Physical Review, 8(1): 1–10, 2018.
[24] M. I. Anthony, O. O. Ige, U. Rilwan, S. A. Jonah, M. A. Aliyu, and Atef El-Tahe. Comparative Analysis of the Excitation Functions of 238U as Breeder Fuel Using OPTMAN Code. Kirkuk Journal of Science, 2023.
)
